Please note that some of these links may have suffered linkrot. They did work as of the date when they were recommended, but the Web is a highly fluid medium.
March 31, 1999
Clickthrough rates for Web advertising may be dropping even
faster than expected. A new study from Nielsen Media Research found
average
clickthrough of 0.15% in February. I had predicted that clickthrough
rates would be cut in half every year as users turn away from misleading and
distracting Web ads, so my expectation was that we would reach 0.25% later this
year. Getting down to 0.15% as early as February is almost too good to
believe in terms of vindicating my statements since 1997 that advertising
doesn't work on the Web. But despite the name, there is no relation between
Nielsen Media Research and myself, so they don't have any particular
reason to vindicate me. And they are a more respected research firm than
most. I do take exception with the comment from one of the researchers that
clickthrough is "like measuring success at a trade show by how many T-shirts
you give away" - a better analogy is how many of the people who visited
your booth send in a response card requesting more product
information. Still not as good as measuring actual sales,
but a pretty good measure of promising leads.
March 31, 1999
Jeff Bezos recently said that "the No. 1
thing is the customer experience" but Amazon.com's new page design
contradicts that goal. Instead of being an optimal book-buying
user interface, Amazon now forces users to scroll through
more than an inch of irrelevant blurbs for their online auctions that
have no relation to the book the user is looking for. The page for
a software engineering book featured an auction of a "Miss Spider Plush
Puppet" smack in the middle of the book description:
polluting the user experience.
March 30, 1999
McAfee's download site seems
to be almost totally down -
overwhelmed by demand for anti-virus software after Melissa.
Yesterday, it was also close to impossible to download virus fixes
from Computer Associates, but they seem to have recovered today.
The general lesson is that the Web is susceptible to flash
crowds
and to have contingency plans to handle huge bursts in volume.
In the case of McAfee, they could at least pull the heavy graphics
from their download page and use a strategy similar to that of MSNBC, CNN,
and other news sites when big stories happen:
go to a lightweight version of the site to conserve bandwidth.
(Historical note: I introduced the term "flash crowds" in the Web sense
when writing about
the mass of users descending on the site for the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer,
but I didn't coin the term, having taken it from a 1973 science fiction story by Larry
Niven.)
March 29, 1999
New York Times story on
mainstream computer games like
Deer Hunter quotes a gaming executive as saying that games
for the larger market
"is for people who want to do much the same things on the computer
-- hunt, fish, play cards, whatever -- that they do in real life."
I disagree. Plenty of games have successfully attracted
mainstream users without being about everyday life. Think
Pac-Man or Tetris. To me, the key to a
mainstream game is that it can be played without an overly steep learning
curve (admittedly, a reality-based metaphor allows users to
transfer their knowledge about the reference domain to the game domain).
"Get a life" implies not spending a week learning a game before it
gets really fun. Also, as people get more and more activities
(both at work and at home - another part of "getting a life"),
they are reluctant to commit 100 hours
to a game. Games for late adopter users must be low
commitment and provide
satisfaction from the beginning. No adventure games where you have to
search half a castle for a stupid key to progress to the next room.
March 27, 1999
The ClueTrain
Manifesto lists 95 reasons Internet business is different from traditional
business. Much overlap with my own comments on Web design over the last five years.
Despite the fact that this manifesto and my own writings are online for
everybody to read, I predict that most big companies will still not get
it because their internal management structures are too well built and capable of
resisting customer-centricity until it's too late. 80% of the Fortune-500
companies will be gone in ten years (unfortunately I don't know which
will be the 100 companies to change in time).
March 24, 1999
Prix Ars Electronica'99 prize
competition for interactive art.
This one is too "cool"
for my taste, but if we take the middle road between the interactive arts
people and the interactive fiction people (see March 22), then we will hopefully get some
innovations to break Web content out of its current funk.
March 23, 1999
Comparing Media Metrix's Web traffic estimates for 1996 and 1999
shows that only 3 of the sites on the top-15 list in 1996 are still on
the list three years later. In other words, 80% of former top sites have dropped
out of the list in this short period. These traffic estimates are good
supporting evidence for my argument that Internet
stock is over-valued because future users are likely to prefer other
sites than the currently popular ones.
A recent survey of British
corporate websites found that 92% of managers expect to
increase spending on Web strategy in 1999, with
34% expecting to double Internet spending this year. Of course, this
increased spending may well be wasted since most companies don't know how
to run a user-focused site. The study also claimed to find that most sites
have improved since last year: for example, 35% refresh content on a daily
basis, compared to 22% last year. Unfortunately people often follow such
superficially correct policies without making the content useful to users
or writing it according to the online writing style guide. So the simple
statistics presented in these popular reports are not necessarily
indicative of any improvements in the Web user experience. On the
contrary, when I review actual empirical data, I am depressed that the
outcome is the same year after year with very little improvement in Web
usability.
March 16, 1999
Dan Shafer discusses the issues in chunking long content
into multiple Web pages. Chunking is important since long scrolling pages
don't work on the Web (and Shafer notes that most users on his site don't read
to the end of long articles). But chunks should be designed
to help users, not just to expose more banners. And a ToC is essential for
any piece with more than 3 chunks.
March 15, 1999
Bill Gates has written a new
book.
We shall see if it's any good, but the special
book website is not promising: a splash screen (the sure sign of
a user-hostile site) that's pretty heavy in graphics followed by a
very heavy home page where all the words are graphics.
It almost goes without saying for such a low-usability site that the
images do not have ALT texts. I wonder if Bill Gates knows that he is being
represented in a way that brutally discriminates against people with
disabilities (and is unpleasant to use for the rest of us).
March 15, 1999
Most schools don't
teach the children how to avoid injuries when using computers; on the
contrary, the kids usually don't have ergonomic furniture, keyboards, and
other equipment that's appropriate for their size, so they may be even
more at risk for RSI than adult users. One of the most important safe
computing practices is to take frequent breaks and stand up but children
are often too captivated by the computer to take even this simple
precaution to prevent damage to their hands and backs. The New York
Times visited schools in New York that "remain focused on teaching
both staff members and students how to use the programs on their new
computers," with desktop publishing being a major curriculum. (Come on:
desktop publishing is an obsolete computer skill, why not teach
the kids Web design so that they would learn something they could use after
they graduate?) Nobody teaches students how to preserve their health.
And then we wonder why health care costs keep going up...
March 9, 1999
I am very critical of advertising on websites, but it's fine for sites to
advertise outside the Web. I am pleased with OnSale's idea for
TV ads that are partly driven by a live feed
from the website: the commercial does contain some fluff (necessary to
catch viewers' attention), but then it also shows real data taken from the
site a few minutes before the broadcast. Good way of making TV viewers
aware of the dynamic nature of the Web and attracting them to visit to get
something specific that is currently featured on the site. Much better than
generic boasting.
March 5, 1999
More than a year ago the Wall St. Journal decided to withdraw
from the Web and put their content behind a subscription wall.
In the long term (5-10 years), not being a fully integrated member of the Web
will seriously erode their brand as people prefer
to link to other online sources and as mainstream search engines (Excite's
NewsTracker, etc.) feed readers to everybody else. But the
WSJ may finally be getting a clue (and their brand is strong enough to
survive a few years in the desert). First sign of re-joining the Web is
Walt Mossberg's column which this week looks at Web-based calendars and
correctly concludes that they are still too clunky.
March 4, 1999
Jon Udell describes a simple way to rank the
Web mindshare of a set of websites.
His list of
computer magazine websites ranks BYTE as number 12
despite the hiatus of that magazine until recently. Using Udell's
metric, Useit would be number 24 on the list (scoring below PC
Gamer). CNET and ZDNet top the list (no surprise), and
LinuxWorld is number 3 (maybe a surprise for some people).
BYTE
Magazine has re-launched as an online-only publication.
The quality of the new material remains to be seen though the first few
articles are promising. One great feature
of the site is a complete archive of all articles since 1994 (including,
for example, an
interview with me
from 1997). BYTE was often first to provide substantial coverage of trends
in personal computing, so the archive is a true treasure trove. Let's get
the 1980s online too.
February 26, 1999
Yesterday in the Microsoft anti-trust case, the judge very reasonably asked a
Microsoft VP to explain the benefit to users from integrating Internet
access into the operating system. According to the
New York Times, the
VP couldn't answer the question beyond unconvincing generic comments.
This "trial-to-define-the-future-of-computing" turns on usability arguments and
yet no user interface experts have been called as witnesses. Maybe the
reason is that both parties are afraid of a thorough usability analysis of
the case:
integration and consistent user interfaces are
clearly a usability win
current integration between the
Internet and WinOff (the Windows-Office platform) is pitiful relative to the
full potential.
Just one idea: enhancing
spell check with Internet integration.
February 25, 1999
Update to the search engine referral stats:
Yesterday, AltaVista shot to the top of the chart. Why?
It's the only major search engine to have indexed my new essay on iCab
(a word many people are searching for right now). The
others apparently have given up producing daily updates to their index.
Other iCab news: iCab now accounts for 0.4% of the traffic on useit,
though that's likely to be disproportionally high because of my iCab
article (people like to read about their own browser - I have seen that
for WebTV as well).
February 24, 1999
Last week's server stats for useit show inflow of traffic from search
and navigation engines in the following order:
Yahoo, Go (formerly Infoseek), AltaVista, Google, Excite,
Snap, Go2net, Mining Co., LookSmart, Lycos, HotBot, AskJeeves, WebCrawler, GoTo,
AOL NetFind, RealNames, EuroSeek. Only the emphasized names matter in terms of
volume. Traffic to a site from a search engine depends on three factors:
the engine's raw traffic (so almost everybody gets a lot of visitors from
Yahoo), the interests of people using a certain kind of engine (so useit will
get uncommonly many visitors from AltaVista and Google since they tend to
be used by the kind of advanced users who care about my topic),
and whether the engine emphasizes quality or quantity
(so, since I think useit is a high-quality site, it will get more
visitors from Go, Google, LookSmart, and Mining Co. because of their emphasis on
guiding users to the best sites).
February 23, 1999
Covering
the doll's eyes is the killer app of Digital Barney. Why? Because
that's Barney's only non-command interaction. Squeezing Barney's
toe to sing a song is just as much a command as grep or
dir: something you do for the sake of the computer and not as
a natural action in your environment. Digital toys will be big in the
future, but they need usability just as much as traditional computers do.
February 22, 1999
Too few sites take
the long term view on the Web and think about the changes over a
multiple-year period. Mark Humphrys does and predicts that many links will
evolve to point to stable sites that remain running, retain their focus, and
keep their pages at the same URLs over many years. For example, his site has
many links to the Irish Times and very few links to the competing
Irish Independent because the Times is more stable.
Since links is one of the main ways to attract traffic, we can predict higher
long-term use of stable sites. Humphrys also thinks that the long-term
perspective favors Yahoo! over smaller sites. I hope not, but I agree that
many sites are reckless in causing linkrot for any author that tries to
give them business by linking to them.
February 19, 1999
At the TED conference Thursday, Douglas Adams (Hitchhiker's Guide) said that we need to make the best of our limitations while we have them. He was mainly talking about other art forms (like film), but the comment rings particularly true for the Web. In a few years, many of the design limitations will be gone and people will shoot for all-out fancy multimedia productions unless we learn now how to produce interactive content that puts the user in control of an information space. It's a necessity now because user-driven interaction is the only thing the Web can do better than other media, and we could well lose the opportunity go beyond traditional one-way video if we don't do so now.
February 18, 1999
In his talk at the Editor & Publisher conference, Bloomberg said that "serious people will always read newspapers". He is wrong. Unfortunately I am not speaking at the conference this year, but two years ago I showed work we had done at that time on flat panel interfaces to the Web (and flat Web devices are coming to market now). Once high-quality Web access becomes a reality (requiring a combination of portable flat screens,
high resolution, anti-aliasing like ClearType, fast bandwidth, a decent browser UI like we hopefully will get with IE 6, and content written for the medium), the
high-end demographics will desert print first because they will be the ones who can afford the good screens and connections and who will be best served with targeted value-added online content in the beginning.
The latest statistics show 43 million hosts on the Internet and 4.3
million websites. Slower annualized growth rates than in the past: 66% for the
Internet and 123% for the Web. We are nowhere near saturation, but the
hyper-growth phase is over. Send in the late adopters.
February 14, 1999
Here we go again: A new survey shows that only
37% of European CEOs
use the Internet at least once per week, even though 82% of the CEOs believe that
"electronic business will have a strategic
impact upon their firms."
The 18% who don't believe in ecommerce may lack vision (or they may run a
chain of barber shops), but that's better than the ignorance of the
45% who do understand that the world of business will be changing
dramatically but avoid a deeper understanding through personal
experience.
American CEOs use the Internet 50% more than
European CEOs: better, but still not enough to prepare them for the future.
February 13, 1999
I try not to say "I told you so" every time I am vindicated, but
this one is too good to let go: Slate Magazine
removes their subscription block and establishes free browsing.
In June 1997 I said that
paid subscriptions don't work on the Web (except for outlier cases like the
Wall St. Journal). Then, when Slate was just about to introduce
their subscription policy, I allocated half of my January 1998 Alertbox to
a more detailed argument under the heading Subscription Fees Fence
You In. I really did tell them so; several times. (And
while we are on the topic of Slate: couldn't you please
kill
the page numbers?)
February 13, 1999
Robert X. Cringely correctly debunks the
Free-PC scam.
February 12, 1999
Review of digital flat-panel displays shows that pretty good ones are now
available for less than $1,000. Unfortunately, these reasonably-priced
displays have a puny 1,024x768 resolution. Since screen resolution
correlates directly with user productivity, I recommend getting a bigger
display. The best monitor right now is probably the Silicon Graphics
1,600x1,024 pixel flat-panel display, which unfortunately costs $2,500.
In any case, future monitor purchases should be restricted to flat panels:
Microsoft's forthcoming ClearType that provides better anti-aliasing
and much enhanced user productivity due to faster reading speed
will only work with LCDs (not CRTs). Once a new version of Windows comes out
with ClearType (2001?)
CRTs should only be used by people whose time is worthless.
February 11, 1999
A reader from Europe writes (slightly changed to preserve anonymity):
"A very expensive Web advertisement campaign was put in place for one of
our sites. This campaign involved permanent banners
on major portals.
The increase in traffic was literally imperceivable.
However, a short spot on [an important] radio show
produced an immediate traffic increase of
around 900% within 24 hours.
A week later the figures started dropping again but one month
later the average page hits remained some 100% higher than the
pre-radio show figures.
Newspaper exposure and other media exposures produced similar results.
Is the conclusion to be drawn that the best way to advertise for
the net is off the net?"
Jakob's comment: I have always said that advertising doesn't work
on the Web. But we need some way of getting people to visit new sites
and it seems that off-line promotions do work as shown by this example
as well as experience from American TV commercials.
February 10, 1999
David Weinberger's essay Down with Reality
says that information is often more "real" than physical objects (in the
sense of having more truth or impact). Interesting point as the Web makes
more things virtual. But let's make the Web better than reality and
not just a replacement.
February 10, 1999
The Fifth Conference on Human Factors & the Web
will be in Maryland on June 3, 1999 (too bad that so little research
is being done that a single day is enough!).
Mark your calendar: this is usually a very interesting event.
The deadline to submit papers or panels is March 8.
This year the conference will focus on Web applications, but they
usually also accept some non-theme presentations.
February 9, 1999
Estée Lauder sues Excite for making another company's
banner ads come up when users search for their name.
Estée Lauder claims that this is a violation of their trademark.
Trademark law protects
consumers from being defrauded by one company pretending to be
another. The question is whether an average user would expect that the
offending banner ad belonged to Estée Lauder and therefore be
cheated if it came from another company that would unfairly benefit from
clickthroughs when the user intended to go to Estée Lauder's site.
Usability theory to the rescue:
Most users view Web banner ads as an
irrelevant annoyance that is not related to their goal. The vast majority
of banners encountered by the average user has a very tenuous relationship
with the content contained in the body of the page.
Thus, users will expect any given banner to
be a random advertisement that is not related to the company they searched
for. In fact, it is rare for users to see banners from companies
they are looking for.
February 8, 1999
Consumer warning: From now on, we cannot trust any recommendations on
Amazon.com since books get included on various recommendation lists
based on how much the publisher pays Amazon. A very stupid
move on Amazon's part: the fees they collect from publishers are not worth
the utter erosion in their credibility. On the Web, trust is very hard to
earn and very easy to lose, so even those parts of Amazon's service that
remain truthful will now be viewed with skepticism by consumers.
In Amazon's defense, promoting books based on kickbacks is standard
bookstore practice: when a physical store places piles of a new book in a
conspicuous location, it is often part of a co-marketing program with the
publisher. But such physical promotions seem less like recommendations and
advice and more like sales, so they don't erode the credibility of the store.
You expect a shop to move product, but that's very different from whether
you can trust their advice or whether the "advice" is noise.
Amazon had attempted to integrate editorial content with sales content:
a great help to users and a way to sell much more than through
sheer sales pressure, but an approach that only works if the editorial
remains credible.
Update Feb. 9: Amazon backs off and agrees to clearly
mark any paid recommendations. A good step to rebuild our faith
in their credibility. These guys are smart: they made a
mistake of above-average stupidity, but we can all make mistakes. The
difference between failure and success on the Web is mostly defined by the
ability to quickly identify mistakes and correct them. Steve Outing's
analysis of Amazon's gaffe is appropriately titled
"Learning
To Be a Publisher, the Hard Way".
February 5, 1999
New York Times reviews
Victoria's Secret's Web broadcast: "barely
visible images of models in white teddies." Having viewed a few minutes
of the show myself (for research purposes, of course), I can only add that
not only were the models hard to see; you also couldn't see the
products.
So maybe it doesn't matter that there was no interaction: no way to "click
here to buy this bra" if you saw one you liked (because you couldn't see
anything). The camera work and lighting further downgraded whatever slight image
quality was provided by the postage-sized video. When will people learn
that it is a very different skill to produce video for the Web than to
produce video for television? Maybe 1.5 million users were curious enough
to connect to the show, but I bet that most of them logged off again after
less than five minutes (of the 21-minute video). Adding insult to injury,
the VS site pops open another browser window when you follow the link to
the fashion show. Keep your hands off my computer, please.
February 5, 1999
"Unique users" and "reach" are irrelevant
measure of website success. Even though it is obviously misleading to do so,
these measures give equal weight to:
people who flee in disgust after one look at a home page
loyal users who return again and again
and rely on a site as a major part of their lives
February 4, 1999
AnchorDesk
now has two million subscribers to its email notification. 100% growth
in a year. To put this number in perspective, the weekday circulation of
The New York Times is "only" one million. The two numbers are
not easy to compare because the newspaper reaches households whereas the
email reaches individuals (also, people can read the website
without getting the email notification - and many people are cutting down
on their email these days). But Jesse Berst may well be the most widely
read columnist in the world now.
February 3, 1999
Bruce "Tog" Tognazzini has a test of user interface
knowledge with questions like "name the 5 pixel locations that are the fastest
to click on". I know the theory and I still didn't score 100% (gulp).
There should have been one more question: "How could the Windows'95/98 taskbar
be made more efficient?" (Answer: make the
inactive line of pixels across the very bottom of the screen clickable. Read Tog's
column to find out why it reduces user productivity to leave this pixel dead.)
Bill
Gates says that he will continue to provide more integrated products
despite the anti-trust suit. Good: I agree that integration often helps
usability and that Web access should be integrated with the basic system.
But let's get real integration this time, please. Windows'98 still
has a lot of wrist-pain inducing double-clicks hidden around the UI (and is
lacking most of the elements needed for a true Internet
desktop).
February 1, 1999
Hal Varian has a great paper on the economics
of information goods. I liked the paper better than Varian's
celebrated book Information
Rules: the paper is focused on problems related to running a
website, whereas the book is too focused on issues related to
running a high-tech company. The paper and the book include many of the
same arguments and the paper is free (Varian would say that he
makes more money off his book by pricing the paper at zero: it serves as a preview of
an experience good).
February 1, 1999
A program scored 11% on the Turing test (percentage of
people who thought that the computer was human while chatting with it).
AI has a long way to go. I still believe in usability as a much better way
of achieving good design.
February 1, 1999
Jesse Berst says that PalmPilot
is making the same mistake Apple made in keeping their platform
closed when up against an open alternative (IBM clones in the case of the
Mac; a variety of CE devices in the case of the Pilot).
January 31, 1999
A user reports
the following experience with Barnes & Noble:
The website claimed to have a book in stock and that it would ship in 1-2 days.
After placing the order, the user received a confirmation email saying
that the book was not in stock and would ship in 1-2 weeks.
In fact, it has still not
been received after 3 weeks, at which point the user canceled the order.
If this story represents more than a single, stand-alone bug, it is a disaster for
B&N. On the Web, credibility and trust are everything because your
company exists as nothing but glowing pixels on the user's screen. Lie to
a user even once and you have lost that customer forever.
I had been rooting for B&N recently because of their improved
design and because we can't afford to let Amazon.com become a monopoly (as
the fulfillment house for affiliate sites, they are Web infrastructure
and not a simple shop). Maybe I should
root for Borders instead: their site is improving
and may have a chance of catching Amazon. (Amazon is still best, so
I shop there while hoping for a competitor to "get it.")
January 29, 1999
Yahoo pays $3.9 billion (plus another billion in stock options) for
GeoCities which hosts 3.5 million amateur home pages. In other words, each
of these small amateur sites is valued at somewhat more than $1,000.
This is playing in the press as proof of the value of large sites, but it
could just as well be proof of the value of tiny sites. Why would
some amateur's site be worth either more or less because of its hosting service?
It's not as if GeoCities adds any unique value in terms of navigation or
ability to find content. On the contrary, somebody who wants to find what
"the people" is saying about a topic would be better off finding amateur
sites through Infoseek or another search engine that covers the full Internet.
In other words, we can now conclude that anybody who gets free space on,
say AOL, and spends an hour or two posting photos of their dog has created
$1,000 in value. Or alternatively, we can conclude that Internet stocks
are over-valued.
January 28, 1999
AT&T introduces
flat-rate calling: from anywhere to
anywhere (inside the U.S.) for the same price for wired and mobile
phones. The new trend to location-independent telecom pricing will be important for
the next phase of untethered Internet use. I predict that we will see
prices of less than a cent per megabyte for world-wide communication (from
anywhere to anywhere on the planet) in less than ten years (pricing per
packet makes more sense than pricing per minute). The
Death of Distance, indeed.
(death of RBOCs, too, unless they get high penetration for xDSL soon).
By the way, the only way I could get from the AT&T home page to the
new initiative was to wait for a news ticker to
get around to showing the headline I wanted. Oh, misery!
January 27, 1999
A Forrester study of loyalty
among Web users found four important factors that drive people
to return to a website:
High Quality Content
Ease of Use
Quick to Download
Updated Frequently
All scoring above 50% among home users. Buzzwords that attract much
attention in current Internet strategy books received minimal scores (14% or less)
in the survey: coupons, brands, "cutting edge technology", customization, and chat.
January 27, 1999
Designing
websites for kids, emphasizing the different considerations for each of the
four age groups: 5 and younger (graphics and audio only), 6-9 (minimal text), 10-12
(research and creativity), and 13-17 (info about other teens). Additional
privacy issues related to young users.
January 26, 1999
MSNBC
polled readers about their use of portals. At the time of this
writing, 1018 responses had been received. 3/4 of the users decided on which
portal to use based on usability: "easy navigation" scored 55% and "fast
downloads" scored "21%". 13% said "brand name content" (which can either
mean "good content", "reliable content", or "famous content" - we don't
know, but the first two are also design considerations).
81% use more than one portal on a regular basis:
there just isn't much loyalty on the Internet (one reason high stock
valuations are ridiculous). The only result that surprised
me was that as many as 22% of the users claimed to click on banner ads
(doesn't square well with the low clickthrough rates that have been recorded
recently). But
I guess that people might select that response category if they have
ever clicked an ad.
January 25, 1999
Web advertising rates fell 6% in 1998,
following my many predictions (most recently 3 days ago, see below) that
advertising doesn't work on the Web.
January 25, 1999
Prodigy
Classic closes because of Y2K problems. Data nugget in the story:
Classic still has 208,000 subscribers and the new version
(launched in 1996) has 433,000 subscribers. In other words, about 1/3 of the
users have not upgraded yet. Further proof of my claim of increased user conservatism. We will probably still have at
least 1/3 of the Web users on browser versions 1 through 4 in two to three
years.
January 22, 1999
Whit Andrews found that only 40% of clicks on banner ads led to something
useful. The remaining 60% linked to something "shameful." This is one
of the main reasons advertising doesn't work on the Web (as stated here
since 1997):
Once users have been burned by enough badly done Web advertising, they
won't bother clicking on any banners, even the ones that would have
taken them to a responsible payoff page. Thus clickthrough is being
cut in half every year (I predict 0.1% clickthrough rates by 2001 with
correspondingly lower CPM). Web advertising is an example of "the tragedy
of the Commons" as bad advertisers ruin it for everybody.
January 21, 1999
It can be computed from Excite's
quarterly report that their revenues per
page view were 1.1 cents. Much better than Yahoo's 0.5 cents per page view
and slightly better than Infoseek's 1.0 cents and Lycos' 0.9 cents per page view. For some
reason, none of these companies include this crucial measure of success in
their own financial reports, but it's pretty easy to compute.
January 21, 1999
The merger of @Home and Excite worries me. While most
media coverage focused on the stock market folly that a press release is
valued at $4.4 billion, Scott Rosenberg (always good for insightful
commentary) noted the fundamental impact on the nature of the Internet:
To keep the Internet free, there needs to be a
separation
between three classes of services: bit-transport,
navigation, and destinations. If a major ISP owns a navigation service
(and the "portal" furthermore gives preference to paying destination sites
instead of the best ones), then the Internet will turn into a collection
of closed proprietary services. Just like the old days of Prodigy, Delphi,
CompuServe, AOL, etc. Will you be able to send email to users of
other services? Or download a video of more than 10 minutes from an
independent website? The anti-trust people had better take a hard look at
this merger: vertical integration is a much more severe threat against a
freely competitive market than whether Microsoft puts a browser into the
operating system (as long as IE treats all sites equally, of
course). The best analogy to the @Home/Excite deal is the time when film studios owned large
chains of movie theaters. Let's keep ISPs as common
carriers.
January 19, 1999
A review
of Web-based discussion group software concludes that there are no good
systems available. I concur. This seems like a golden opportunity for
somebody to make usability the design goal and create a good discussion
group package.
January 15, 1999
The Web Consortium releases guidelines for making sites
accessible for users with disabilities. Nicely done with priorities
for things that are essential vs. things that would be nice. Goes
far beyond simply adding ALT texts (though that's obviously one of the
recommendations).
January 15, 1999
Why are all the books about the Network Economy bad? I
have read many highly promoted books recently, but they are all
disappointing: the books focus on the future of the technology industry,
so they would be good reading if you have invented the next Java, PointCast,
or Palm Pilot. But they have little helpful advice for an online
toy store, a medical information service, or a vendor of earth-moving equipment.
The perspective of most
books is that of thinking up ways to force the "others" out there to use
your technology. Never what these folks would use this
technology for in their own business. Even though it is not perfect, I
think that Kevin
Kelly's New Rules for the New Economy: 10 Radical Strategies for a
Connected World is an exception. It actually has food for
thought for people working on Web strategy in non-tech firms.
(I recently bought customers.com - I will post my impressions here
once I have read the book.)
January 14, 1999
Despite increased profits, Steve Jobs says that
Apple will not revive
its R&D spending. He says that "focus and leadership" is more
important than research spending. True, if you are aiming at incremental advances.
But if you want the next big thing, then you have to research 10 wild ideas, 9
of which never pan out.
More evidence that Apple's strategy is to fleece its remaining loyal
customers while slowly closing down the company (or at least the Mac).
Nice to know that there is at least one place where I beat Bill
Gates:
The Industry Standard has a who's
who of the Internet economy: this week's statistics show that my entry is
number 7 and Bill's
is number 8 in terms of readership.
January 13, 1999
In November 1998 I calculated that Yahoo had 0.4 cents revenues per page
view. Their most recent quarterly results show 0.5 cents per page
view, though is is impossible to say whether the improvement is simply due to
seasonal variations over the holidays. This type of usage analysis is often
left out of current press
coverage of Internet stock exuberance.
(January 13)
CNet's Builder.com has a good info package on how to
design
websites for kids. The presentation is clearly designed for the Web
with modularized content and rich linking to their own site and resources
from across the Web. Too many other sites never link to the outside under
the theory that they don't want users to leave (guess what: the users know
where the Back button sits, so they are going to leave anyway if
you don't provide the highest possible value - including outbound links).
January 9, 1999
Amazon.com does so many things right that it is an unusual pleasure to
report that Barnes & Noble does have one usability advantage:
better use of progressive disclosure and content
prioritization.
Look, for example, at B&N's
search for books by a specific
author:
out-of-print books are (correctly) relegated to a secondary page
(progressive disclosure), and the list of in-print books is (correctly)
sorted by the probability that the user wants the books.
Search listings on Amazon.com confusingly intermix in-print and used
books; even though some prioritization is used to show best-sellers first,
the full list contains duplicates of the short-listed books (making it
harder to scan and understand). Another mistake at Amazon: the search
results do not have a unique URL, so I can't link to it (you have to do
the search yourself).
I still like Amazon.com best: lower prices and better book-description
pages, but B&N wins on search. Congrats, B&N: this is why we need
multiple websites in each category.
January 9, 1999
It is now possible to make Google the default search engine for both IE
and Netscape. Why not go to a useful search engine rather than the one that paid
the browser vendor the most money.
January 5, 1999
Microsoft launches a special MacTopia subsite with targeted information for their Macintosh
customers. Great idea to extend the trend toward vertical portals and
embed a hub on the site itself. But unfortunate "out there" design: lose
the pulsating logo, please. And it's a disaster to deviate this much from
the general site design and navigation. Microsoft's webteam just completed
a commendably
user-focused redesign and then they throw away all the gains in the
new, completely inconsistent, subsite.
To compound the problem, the IE for Mac
page has a third design. Fragmenting website spinning out
of control faster than you can say "department infighting".
January 5, 1999
Appropriately skeptic
review of the electronic books: "the type on
both machines is one generation removed from dot matrix"; with comments on
better electronic text to come in the future.
(Seattle Times)
January 1, 1999
No news will be posted until January 5: I am on vacation in Big Sur
without my laptop. As the Internet becomes ubiquitous, true
luxury will involve being offline and out of touch. But check Tomalak's Realm for daily links
to the best content on the Web that day.